Log in

Supreme Court News
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in Supreme Court News' LiveJournal:

[ << Previous 20 ]
Thursday, June 28th, 2007
5:41 pm
Court strikes racial diversity school programs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Students cannot be assigned to public schools because of their race, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in a significant civil rights decision that casts doubt on integration efforts adopted across the country.

By a 5-4 vote on the last day of its term, the court's conservative majority struck down voluntary programs adopted in Seattle and Louisville, Kentucky, to attain racial diversity in public school classrooms.

The ruling added to a string of decisions this term in which President George W. Bush's two appointees -- Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito -- have shifted the court sharply to the right on divisive social issues like abortion.

"The principle that racial balancing is not permitted is one of substance, not semantics," Roberts wrote for the majority. "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

The court's four liberal members said in a bitter dissent that the ruling threatened the Supreme Court's historic Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954 that outlawed racial segregation in the nation's public schools.

"The last half century has witnessed great strides toward racial equality, but we have not yet realized the promise of Brown," Justice Stephen Breyer wrote. "This is a decision that the court and the nation will come to regret."

Justice John Paul Stevens, in a separate dissent, said, "There is a cruel irony in the chief justice's reliance on our decision in Brown v. Board of Education."

The Supreme Court addressed similar issues in 2003 when it ruled by 5-4 that racial preferences can be used in university admission decisions. Since then, Alito replaced the author of that opinion, the more moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.


Roberts and Alito were joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas, the court's only black member, who wrote a separate opinion emphasizing his view that the U.S. Constitution is "colorblind."

Kennedy agreed the two programs must be struck down, but he refused to go as far as the other conservatives wanted.

Kennedy's opinion held that public schools may use ways other than race-based assignments to schools to foster diversity, such as the drawing of school boundary lines.

It marked the first time the court had addressed a school district's voluntary use of race-based pupil assignments for a purpose other than to remedy the effects of past segregation. The ruling could force the revamping of race-based admissions and school selection procedures nationwide.

In one case, Seattle used race as a tie-breaking factor in deciding who gets into certain public high schools when too many students sought admission.

In the other case, the Louisville area school district used similar racial guidelines to keep black student enrollment at most elementary, middle and high schools between 15 percent and 50 percent.

The court majority struck down both programs -- a position the Bush administration had recommended.

Democratic presidential candidates denounced the decision.

"Once again, the Roberts court has shown its willingness to erode core constitutional guarantees," said New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois called it a "wrong-headed ruling" while former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina termed the decision "deeply saddening."

Opponents of the programs applauded the ruling. "Now, an estimated 1,000 school districts around the country that are sending the wrong message about race to kids will have to stop," said Sharon Browne of Pacific Legal Foundation.
Thursday, June 29th, 2006
9:11 am
Wednesday, April 26th, 2006
3:27 pm
Hey folks-

As I'm sure you've noticed, it's been a few days since I've updated. I don't think I'm going to get to it anytime soon, so I thought I would let y'all know that I'm taking a hiatus until about the 19th, enough to get me through finals. If anyone would like to post in my absence, I'll grant mod duties.

Monday, April 17th, 2006
6:19 pm
Wednesday, April 12th, 2006
2:36 pm
Tuesday, April 4th, 2006
11:42 pm
Sunday, April 2nd, 2006
11:41 am
Friday, March 31st, 2006
2:11 pm
Thursday, March 30th, 2006
10:53 am
Monday, March 27th, 2006
12:52 pm
Sunday, March 26th, 2006
6:13 pm
Saturday, March 25th, 2006
12:58 pm
Thursday, March 23rd, 2006
2:55 pm
Know I haven't updated in a few days, sorry. Expect a bigass post in the next couple hours. Until then....

Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Souter Argue Over Who Is More Gay (Wonkette)

I suggest a vote. Who IS more gay - Roberts or Souter?

I'll post results in an upcoming entry.

Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006
3:26 pm
The Onion's SCOTUS
WASHINGTON, DC—The Supreme Court, demonstrating its new constructionist leaning since the appointment of Justice Samuel Alito, will re-examine arguments behind the 19th Amendment this week. "There was no constitutional precedent for amending the law of the land so dramatically," the Heritage Foundation's Trent England said Monday. "A case could be made on social grounds, but what the Court will determine is exactly what the framers of the Constitution wanted."

While it's difficult to predict an outcome, observers believe Ruth Bader Ginsburg will use her three-fifths of a vote to oppose.


I figured this would be a brief, yet nice change of pace for the day.

Current Mood: busy
Monday, March 20th, 2006
5:35 pm
Sunday, March 19th, 2006
2:06 pm
Judge reduces sentence after U.S. Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court on the March

This is not news, but it showed up in my inbox as a Google News alert, and I thought it was relevant to y'all.

Supreme Court collection
Saturday, March 18th, 2006
7:04 am
Thursday, March 16th, 2006
7:32 pm
3:40 am
Tuesday, March 14th, 2006
4:52 pm
[ << Previous 20 ]
Official Supreme Court Website   About LiveJournal.com